Melon Farmers Blog

Watching UK Censors

Is the London Book Fair Supporting Chinese Censorship?…Should a state that bans and censors books and imprisons writers be guest of honour at the 2012 London Book Fair

Read more UK News at MelonFarmers.co.uk

See article from guardian.co.uk by Richard Lea

london book fair 2012 logoNext week the London Book Fair welcomes China, the world’s largest publisher by volume, as the 2012 market focus and has teamed up with the British Council to invite around 20 Chinese writers to west London for a series of readings, discussions and talks celebrating the best in Chinese literature. But the writers who make up the delegation and the events at which they’ll be speaking have been chosen in consultation with partners including China’s General Administration of Press and Publishing (Gapp), whose responsibilities include the censorship of newspapers and publishers. According to writer Ma Jian this makes true cultural exchange impossible, and puts freedom of expression in China under yet more pressure:

For China to be named guest of honour. for the British cultural establishment to be shaking hands with the Chinese head of propaganda, a man responsible for the banning and censoring of books and the imprisonment of writers, is disgraceful.

…Read the full article

14 April, 2012 Posted by | Book Censorship | , , | Leave a Comment

Kindle Book Censors…Amazon suspends the Kindle account of Digital Managa

Read more Book News at MelonFarmers.co.uk

See article from digitalmanga.com

digital manga logoDigital Manga wrote:

As March 15, 2012, Digital Manga Inc.’s account has been suspended from the Kindle platform. While we’re working to try and amend the situation, we will not be able to publish titles to the Kindle for the foreseeable future. Our account was suspended under troubling circumstances – we have had titles cited for content violation, and while we screen every title to ensure they adhere to Kindle’s standards, their guidelines are notoriously vague, and prohibit Pornography and hard-core material that depicts graphic sexual acts.

There is no definition of pornography versus erotica officially available from amazon. In the past, we considered our titles the latter, and strive to comply with Amazon’s guidelines. However, with such vague guidelines and a veritable library of erotica in written and drawn form already available on the Kindle, it is difficult to discern exactly what rules Amazon wanted us to comply with. We also find it disheartening that our titles depicting male homosexual romance have been banned while erotica depicting other forms of intercourse flourishes. What makes relationships between men more objectionable than erotic tristes between men and women? This is a question we imagine you’re all asking yourselves right now, and a question that we need Amazon to answer for us.

While we work to restore our account, we encourage yaoi fans to explore alternate platforms for reading manga. Our titles are available on emanga.com, Nook (including free apps for your PC, iPad, or Android tablet), and on the DMP App for Apple products and Android Tablets. This event has also led us to pursue the possibility of making digital manga available through other platforms. We look forward to continuing to bring you all the best in manga content, yaoi or otherwise, and appreciate your continuing support.

For Information the Kindle content rules re porn are simply:

See article from kdp.amazon.com

Pornography

We don’t accept pornography or offensive depictions of graphic sexual acts.

Offensive

Content What we deem offensive is probably about what you would expect.

Thankfully Amazon soon changed their stance, and Digital Manga posted again:

See article from digitalmanga.com

Due to the events that transpired on Thursday, March 15th we were prepared for the worst. But thanks to the massive outpouring of fan support protesting Kindle’s illogical censorship policies and flimsy guidelines, Digital Manga’s Kindle account was restored in record time. We had expected an uphill battle, but manga fans and advocates of equal rights made their voices heard and Amazon realized how loud you all can be. This morning, we received this email:

After reviewing your response, we have reinstated your account and we will once again accept your books for possible publication.

Please be advised that all of your submissions must comply with our Content Guidelines for publishing in the Kindle Store and that your future submissions may be subject to additional review prior to being published. This may result in a delay in publishing.

17 March, 2012 Posted by | Book Censorship | | Leave a Comment

Pally Again…Paypal book censors back off from general bans but may still object to specific books

Read more Book News at MelonFarmers.co.uk

See article from xbiz.com

paypal logoPayPal retracted its threat to close the accounts of online booksellers who sell works that they claim could be considered obscene.

In a statement posted on its website today, PayPal announced that in the future it will not reject e-books that consist only of text unless they contain child pornography, or … text and obscene images of rape, bestiality or incest (as defined by the U.S. legal standard for obscenity…).

PatPal committed to limit its objections to particular books rather than rejecting entire classes. It also said that it is developing a process that will allow an author to challenge a PayPal notice that a book violates its policy.

The PayPal statement does not fully resolve all issues, however. It is not clear whether legal material would be affected by PayPal’s policy regarding e-books that contain child pornography, some of which may be legal.

This decision recognizes the important principle that neither PayPal nor any other company involved in payment processing has any business telling people what they should read, said Joan Bertin, executive director of the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC).

14 March, 2012 Posted by | Book Censorship | , | Leave a Comment

A Weak Response from the Paypal Book Censors…Forbes finds that it is not Visa pushing book censorship on Paypal

Read more Book News at MelonFarmers.co.uk

See article from forbes.com
See Paypal’s official repsonse from thepaypalblog.com

forbes logoThere has been a lot of criticism of PayPal across the web, in the erotica and general fiction communities in the last few days. PayPal responded on their blog, saying:

Unlike many other online payment providers, PayPal does allow its service to be used for the sale of erotic books. PayPal is a strong and consistent supporter of openness on the Internet, freedom of expression, independent publishing and eBook marketplaces. We believe that the Internet empowers authors in a way that is positive and points to an even brighter future for writers, artists and creators the world over, but we draw the line at certain adult content that is extreme or potentially illegal.

The problem here is in the weasel words extreme and potentially. How is PayPal to say what is extreme? Or potentially illegal? If they are concerned about facilitating the sale of illegal content they should work with the community to figure out what to do about it, not impose ill-defined and vague strictures on the publishing and distribution companies that use their services.

Then we have:

Some feedback we’re getting is a belief that PayPal is forcing its moral beliefs on others and restricting people’s right to free speech. We can tell you with 100 percent conviction that this is not our intention. While we understand that people don’t always agree with our policies, this decision has nothing to do with our personal views on the content or any desire to limit free-speech rights.

It may not be PayPal’s intention to censor fiction, but it is the effect of their policy nonetheless. But we didn’t mean it like that is a poor response.

Blogger Madeleine Morris, writing on Banned Writers, published a response from Visa to her enquiries about the issues which disputes this view:

Dear Ms. Morris,

Thank you for your email regarding PayPal’s recent decision to limit the sale of certain erotica content. First and foremost, we want to clarify that Visa had no involvement with PayPal’s conclusion on this issue. Nor have we seen the material in question. This fact is made clear by PayPal’s recent blog post where it states that its own policies drove the decision.

[T]he sale of a limited category of extreme imagery depicting rape, bestiality and child pornography is or is very likely to be unlawful in many places and would be prohibited on the Visa system whether or not the images have formally been held to be illegal in any particular country. Visa would take no action regarding lawful material that seeks to explore erotica in a fictional or educational manner.

[...] Visa is not in the business of censoring cultural product. We recognize, as courts in the U.S. and elsewhere have long recognized, that this is a challenging topic. Bright lines are difficult to establish. We welcome the input of all stakeholders regarding our policies as we work to sustain a network that supports global commerce, while respecting the laws of the countries where we operate.

However you look at it, PayPal is imposing its moral position on writers and publishers because it is asking for work to be taken down that has not been found illegal.

…Read the full article

11 March, 2012 Posted by | Book Censorship | , | Leave a Comment

A Letter to the Paypal Book Censors…The topics PayPal would ban have been depicted in world literature since Sophocles’ Oedipus and Ovid’s Metamorphoses

Read more Book News at MelonFarmers.co.uk

See article from publishersweekly.com

Oedipus Trilogy ebookTell PayPal: Don’t Censor Books

PayPal, which plays a dominant role in processing online sales, has taken full advantage of the vast and open nature of the Internet for commercial purposes, but is now holding free speech hostage by clamping down on sales of certain types of erotica. As organizations and individuals concerned with intellectual and artistic freedom and a free Internet, we strongly object to PayPal functioning as an enforcer of public morality and inhibiting the right to buy and sell constitutionally protected material. Recently, PayPal gave online publishers and booksellers, including BookStrand.com, Smashwords, and eXcessica, an ultimatum: it would close their accounts and refuse to process all payments unless they removed erotic books containing descriptions of rape, incest, and bestiality. The result would severely restrict the public’s access to a wide range of legal material, could drive some companies out of business and deprive some authors of their livelihood.

Financial services providers should be neutral when it comes to lawful online speech. PayPal’s policy underscores how vulnerable such speech can be and how important it is to stand up and protect it.

The topics PayPal would ban have been depicted in world literature since Sophocles’ Oedipus and Ovid’s Metamorphoses. And while the books currently affected may not appear to be in the same league, many works ultimately recognized for their literary, historical, and artistic worth were reviled when first published. Books like Ulysses and Lady Chatterley’s Lover were banned as obscene in the United States because of their sexual content. The works of Marquis de Sade, which include descriptions of incest, torture, and rape, were considered scandalous when written, although his importance in the history of literature and political and social philosophy is now widely acknowledged.

The Internet has become an international public commons, like an enormous town square, where ideas can be freely aired, exchanged, and criticized. That will change if private companies, which are under no legal obligation to respect free speech rights, are able to use their economic clout to dictate what people should read, write, and think.

PayPal, and the myriad other payment processors that support essential links in the free speech chain between authors and audiences, should not operate as morality police.

Signed by:

American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression
Association of American Publishers
Authors Guild
Comic Book Legal Defense Fund
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Feminists for Free Expression
Internet Archive
National Coalition Against Censorship
Northern California Independent Booksellers Association
Peacefire
PEN American Center
Southern California Independent Booksellers Association
Southern Independent Booksellers Alliance
Woodhull Sexual Freedom Alliance

9 March, 2012 Posted by | Book Censorship, Internet | Leave a Comment

Who’s behind the Paypal Book Censorship?…The Paypal ban on erotica may be part of a larger move towards censorship

Read more Book News at MelonFarmers.co.uk

See article from techdirt.com

ashwordsRe Paypal’s ban on text based erotica and small self publishing companies:

While the government in the US is not able to censor speech, there is little preventing a private company like Paypal or its credit card partners from taking these actions. Yet, Smashwords is not giving up hope. In its latest update, Smashwords notes that it had managed to get the deadline extended as well as the definitions of prohibited content relaxed. It also wants to clarify that neither it nor Paypal are the real villians in this issue.

A lot of people have been attacking Smashwords for my decision to comply with PayPal’s requirements. They’re pointing their arrows at the wrong target, and they’re not helping their cause. We’re working to effect positive long term change for the entire Smashwords community, and that includes all our erotica authors and readers.

Over the weekend, many Smashwords authors and publishers demanded we abandon PayPal and find a new payment processor. It’s not so simple, and it doesn’t solve the greater problem hanging over everyone’s head. PayPal is trying to implement the requirements of credit card companies, banks and credit unions. This is where it’s all originating. These same requirements will eventually rain down upon every other payment processor. PayPal is trying to maintain their relationships with the credit card companies and banks, just as we want to maintain our relationship with PayPal. People who argue PayPal is the evil villain and we should drop them are missing the bigger picture. Should we give up on accepting credit cards forever? The answer is no. This goes beyond PayPal. Imagine the implications if credit card companies start going after the major ebook retailers who sell erotica?

…Read the full article

6 March, 2012 Posted by | Book Censorship, Internet | , | Leave a Comment

Publishers Descended into Savage Censorship…Lord of Flies publisher demanded that William Goldring write out allusions to christianity

Read more Book News at MelonFarmers.co.uk

See article from thisiscornwall.co.uk

Lord Flies William GoldingThe author of a classic novel which charts the descent into savagery of a group of marooned schoolboys was ordered to remove a Christian theme from the book before it was published.

The surprising insistence of publishers editing William Golding’s seminal work Lord of the Flies has emerged in correspondence released on the centenary of the author’s birth. As well as telling Golding to steer clear of Christianity, his publishers also ordered details of nuclear holocaust to be struck from the pages.

In 1954, Golding was an author struggling to find a publisher for his first book, Lord of the Flies, an allegorical tale of civilisation crashing into barbarism. It had been rejected 10 times, including by Faber and Faber, who then relented and finally put the book into print.

Correspondence with publishers, which have not been made public until now, forms a central part of new display at Oxford’s Bodleian library. Also on display for the first time is the rejection note from Faber which called the novel an absurd and uninteresting fantasy. Rubbish and dull.

Eventually the book was championed by a publishing executive, Charles Montieth. The letters reveal Montieth objected to what Golding called the theophany of the novel, the appearance of God to man, and the obvious Christianity of Simon, another of the boys marooned on the island after the plane crash.

1 November, 2011 Posted by | Book Censorship | , , | Leave a Comment

Educationally Challenged…Nutter MP repeats her call to appoint the BBFC as book censors for sex education material

Read more UK Parliament Watch at MelonFarmers.co.uk

See article from bbc.co.uk

andrea leadsomConservative MP Andrea Leadsom has repeated her call for sex education books to be classified by the BBFC.

Leadsom claims some of the material being taught to children as young as five is extraordinarily inappropriate. She wants books and videos used for sex education to be given a rating by the British Board of Film Classification before they are used in schools.

During a Westminster Hall debate, Leadsom said many adults were horrified when they found out what children were being taught about sex. She said:

 I’ve seen cartoons of two people engaged in sexual activities with the caption ‘Here are some ways mummies and daddies fit together’, others depicting two cartoon characters locked in an intimate embrace, accompanied by a vivid explanation, using sexual terminology of the act of intercourse.

As well as cartoons I’ve been shown a video of two people engaged in intercourse, with a child’s voice over the top, saying, ‘it looks like they’re having fun’.

She also wants the law changed so that parents actively have to opt in to sex lessons, rather than opt out, as is currently the case if they have objections.

Schools minister, Nick Gibb, said all sex education material used in state schools was scrutinised to ensure it set the right tone. The education secretary had set out statutory guidelines for schools and councils to follow, he added, which would ensure that inappropriate content would not be used.

Comment: Parental Guidance

Perhaps a Sex Ed Parental Guidance certificate would read:

Suitable for children of all ages. Children are advised to consider whether the material may upset sensitive parents before showing it to them.

26 October, 2011 Posted by | Book Censorship, UK Parliament | , , , | Leave a Comment

The Uncensored Picture of Dorian Gray…Censored texts restored to Oscar Wilde’s novel

Read more Book News at MelonFarmers.co.uk

See article from telegraph.co.uk

Picture Dorian Gray Annotated UncensoredAn uncensored version of Oscar Wilde’s only novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray, has finally been published.

JM Stoddart, Wilde’s editor, made a number of alterations to downplay the overt homoeroticism in the novel before it appeared in Lippincott’s Monthly Magazine in June 1890.

He also removed references to the protagonist’s female lovers as mistresses, and withdrew other sections that smacked of decadence, according to Nicholas Frankel, the editor of the new, original edition.

But his efforts did not go far enough, and following its publication more passages were removed, The Guardian reported.

One section reading It is quite true I have worshipped you with far more romance of feeling than a man should ever give to a friend was changed to: From the moment I met you, your personality had the most extraordinary influence on me.

Frankel said it was time to published the uncensored text, claiming he hoped to bring it out of the closet for a 21st century audience.

28 April, 2011 Posted by | Book Censorship | , , | Leave a Comment

Classic Censorship…Huckleberry Finn published with the word ‘nigger’ replaced by ‘slave’

Read more US Censorship News at MelonFarmers.co.uk

Based on article from publishersweekly.com

Mark Twains Adventures Sawyer HuckleberryMark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is a classic. Yet, for decades, it has been disappearing from grade school curricula across the country, relegated to optional reading lists, or banned outright, appearing again and again on lists of the nation’s most challenged books, and all for its repeated use of a single word: nigger.

Twain scholar Alan Gribben and NewSouth Books now plan to release a version of Huckleberry Finn, in a single volume with The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, that does away with the word ‘nigger’ by replacing it with the word slave. It also replaces the word Injun.

This is not an effort to render Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn colorblind, said Gribben: Race matters in these books. It’s a matter of how you express that in the 21st century.

4 January, 2011 Posted by | Book Censorship, world | , , | Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.